
For the past several months I’ve been obsessed. I’ve been obsessed with a need to explain the actions of the muscles of the upper half as they relate to the typical Left AIC and Right BC pattern. It started when I was teaching Postural Respiration in Washington DC last year. One of the course attendees said “Mike, you need to make a document like the one in myokin”. She was referring to the document titled “Positional and compensatory influences of the Left AIC pattern on muscles of the lumbo-pelvic-femoral region” that’s on pages 18, 19 and 20 in the Myokinematic Restoration manual. I helped James Anderson edit that excellent document of his on a cold winter day in Nebraska a couple of years ago. Anyway, this was something that she wanted: a document that explained in a similar fashion, the actions of the musculature of the upper half. I agreed that that was a great idea and thus began the obsession. I didn’t realize how bad it was until folks at my office began to mention my desk being a mess. Well, it’s always a mess, but this was a little worse than usual. I wonder if that course attendee remembers asking and I wonder if she’s aware of what she’s done.
As I have been working on this device, I came across some issues with regard to the levator scapula. I labored over this muscle (and a few others since I’m not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed) and continued to run into walls. I was stuck. No problem, I thought. I’ll call my buddy James! He and I have spent many an hour laboring over more-complicated stuff than a simple levator scapula. Together I knew we could reconcile good old levator. End result: hmmm. A non-definitive conclusion; although I think James had it but I kept throwing a wrench in the works. We both agreed that I should call Ron. Surely Yoda himself could square this away.
So as I continued laboring over the big document I called Ron. “Ron”, I said, “I’m having some trouble with levator scapula”. Well, little did I know that he was in the middle of a big meeting with Bobbie Rappl regarding the new exercise CD. Bobbie just loves it when I call. Ron began explaining as I wrote notes and eventually Bobbie signaled to him that he was supposed to be in a meeting with her. We said our good byes and I began anew with my new thoughts on levator scapula.
Not five minutes had passed and I discovered a new obsession. Not mine, Ron’s! My phone rings: “Mike, its Ron”, he said. “Bobbie is pretty upset because I’m calling you back when we should be in our meeting but I just had to. I couldn’t let go of this levator scapula thing. I want us to nail it down and I want you to create a document on levator scapula. We need it and it’s more important than the document you’re currently working on”. So for the next 30 minutes we focused our attention on levator scapula. The end-result is the completed treatise available to you now. As for Washington DC…Don’t worry, I’m on a roll. I’m having a few issues I need to deal with right now though. I know…maybe I can call Bobbie and Ron again.
To read the article on the Levator Scapula CLICK HERE!
Written by: Mike Cantrell | Posted by: Jen Zamora
We are frequently asked about what we do for specific diagnoses like rotator cuff pain, hip pain, scoliosis, lower back pain, etc. The list goes on and on. My initial response is always the same: “that depends on what we see on the initial examination.” There are many causes of lower back pain. Ask any clinician: PTs, orthopedic surgeons, nurses, PAs, neurosurgeons and they will all echo the same sentiment. You can’t treat the disorder until you know the cause. This rings especially true for the PT.
In the photograph below you are looking at an image of a young baseball player who was complaining of left lower back pain and right shoulder pain. His diagnosis from the MD was simply: “Pain” in the respective body parts. This, of course, is inadequate as a useful definition from a PT perspective, but it certainly points us in the right direction! Once a patient arrives in the clinic we will begin an evaluative process that examines objective evidence as well as other obvious issues. You may see friends or family members who have similar postural issues like this one pictured.
Presentation on initial examination:
Note the following: right shoulder lower than left, right scapula (shoulder blade) tilted and “winging-out” more than the left, right side of waist appears more concave than the left side, the hip crests seem “torqued” when comparing the right to the left. These findings plus objective data noted on the clinical exam allow us to begin an intervention program designed to alter the cause of his postural deviations and his pain. The end result is reduction of pain and in many cases changes in postural presentation.
Written by: Mike Cantrell | Posted by: Jen Zamora
As Physical Therapists, we are often asked to look at a great deal of different musculoskeletal problems. Our observations on the initial examination are vitally important for the establishment of a sound treatment plan.
In the following videos I want you to look at the young lady and try to see the deviations in her gait pattern.
Click here to view the “Before” video.
Then look at the second video, which shows her gait pattern after multiple treatments.
She was not referred to therapy for alteration in her gait but for treatment of pain. However, when we examined this young lady, we realized that the gait deviations were a significant part of her problem and were partly responsible for perpetuating her pain and were also a by-product of other larger issues.
In the first video of her gait, note that she appears to have a near collision of her knees as she swings one leg forward. Also, note the hyper-relaxed arm swing and that the arm swing is nearly side to side. Note the dramatic internal rotation of the femurs as she loads weight onto her leg. These are just obvious examples of instability created by a lack of recruitment of appropriate muscles. It also indicates a pelvis that is rotated forward on both sides.
Take another look at the second video. This video was taken following multiple visits to Physical Therapy here at the Cantrell Center. Note the major correction of the items outlined above. This was accomplished with proper training of specific muscles. Training certain muscles to lessen their activity and others to increase activity is a classic method for therapists to improve patient outcomes here at the Cantrell Center.
Written by: Mike Cantrell | Posted by: Jen Zamora
Last Friday I had a great experience. I have a patient by the name of Dr. Matt Dixon. Some PRC therapists know Dr. Dixon since the Interdisciplinary Integration course last April. He is an optometrist and he and I went to hear Dr. Heidi Wise speak on visual integration. Some might say I dragged him there! It was there that he met several members of the PRI subculture. Dr. Dixon also met Dr. Mike Hoefs who took a quick look at Matt for me and spoke of a need to modify his bite.
Well, I started getting interested and naturally I wanted to make the wheels turn faster. To make a long story short I set it up for Dr. Hoefs to come on down to beautiful Warner Robins, GA and work with my orthodontist, Dr. Gary Pool, who is also a patient of mine and a PRI enthusiast. We met on Friday August 12th and worked on Matt. Imagine four clinicians: a dentist, an orthodontist, a physical therapist and an optometrist, all interested in interdisciplinary integration spending a Friday in an empty orthodontists’ office working together. It was great!
Dr. Hoefs was a gem. He explained and showed Dr. Pool and me what he knew about Dr. Dixon’s mandibular/maxillary relationship and I applied it to my physical therapy world as Dr. Pool applied it to his orthodontic world. From there he helped us understand what treatment techniques were appropriate, how to adjust appliances and what to expect as we progress from the initial phases of his program to later down the road. Dr. Dixon is now in an ALF splint and as of today is reporting reduced symptoms!
I am writing this as a means to motivate those of you who wish to become more fluent in understanding the TMCC as it relates to dentistry, splinting and bracing. Course work is great and attending classes taught by the PRI faculty is great but another facet to your learning may be to do what I did and get Dr. Hoefs to come and train you or your dentist or orthodontist. I know he is willing to do it. All you have to do is set it up with him. I am very grateful to Ron Hruska for having the vision to get us all thinking out of the box when it comes to biomechanics and when it comes to interdisciplinary integration. I sure wouldn’t have gotten this far on my own. And as for Dr. Hoefs; Thanks for the consulting work my friend.

Written by Mike Cantrell
Posted by Jen Zamora



